<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CogJoint &#187; Carbon Footprint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cogjoint.com/index.php/category/carbon-footprint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cogjoint.com</link>
	<description>Ride the Ride. Talk the Love.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 04:18:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>aD(vO)cAT{s}.bi[cy]cLIng(on)s</title>
		<link>http://www.cogjoint.com/index.php/2012/08/advocats-bicyclingons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cogjoint.com/index.php/2012/08/advocats-bicyclingons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MexicanSongBird</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Footprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cogjoint.com/?p=8398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bicycle advocacy comes down to one thing and one thing only: It&#8217;s about the safety stupid. Many issues stated by bicy.cling(on) advocates as their primary goals of advocacy befuddle the real objective; increase safety. People, in general, are naturally concerned about the environment, health and city planning concepts that strengthen a sense of community, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-8399" style="border: 0px none;" title="advocate" src="http://www.cogjoint.com/wp_sys/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/advocate.jpg" alt="" width="325" height="248" />Bicycle advocacy comes down to one thing and one thing only: <strong><span style="color: #888888;"><em>It&#8217;s about the safety stupid. </em></span></strong></p>
<p>Many issues stated by bicy.cling<em><span style="color: #888888;">(on)</span></em> advocates as their primary goals of advocacy befuddle the real objective; increase safety. People, in general, are naturally concerned about the environment, health and city planning concepts that strengthen a sense of community, but ask them why they don&#8217;t ride their bikes and you&#8217;re likely to get the answer: <strong><em><span style="color: #888888;">&#8220;It&#8217;s not safe.&#8221;</span></em></strong></p>
<p>Studies have shown when people feel safe they&#8217;ll venture out on their bikes, and studies have also shown the safety quotient naturally increases as more people ride bikes; it&#8217;s a symbiotic relationship.</p>
<p>Many of the advocates I&#8217;ve met recently (who seem to be an<span style="color: #000000;"><em> &#8220;advocate&#8221;</em></span> first and a <em>&#8220;cyclist&#8221; </em>somewhere else down the chain of priorities) focus on the outcomes of  increasing the number of people on bikes rather than the solution to increasing those numbers; they focus on environmental issues, health concerns, community and social engineering and not safety as the primary motivator to getting people on their bikes.</p>
<p>Those outcomes will be a great consequence of increasing safety and would unlikely be achieved without addressing safety first.</p>
<p>We need to keep people who ride their bikes safe from harm. Solutions that protect cyclists will also protect motorists and pedestrians too.  The rest will follow.</p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;"><em><strong>nO hablas tOnTas AniMaUx!</strong></em></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="fb-root"></div>
   <script>
   window.fbAsyncInit = function() {
   FB.init({appId: "364015433630063", status: true, cookie: true,
		 xfbml: true});
	};
 (function() {
  var e = document.createElement("script"); e.async = true;
 e.src = document.location.protocol +
   "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js";
 document.getElementById("fb-root").appendChild(e);
}());
</script><span class = ""  style = "  float: left; "><fb:like href="http://www.cogjoint.com/index.php/2012/08/advocats-bicyclingons/" send = "true" layout="standard" show_faces="true" width="" action="like" colorscheme="light" font="arial" /></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cogjoint.com/index.php/2012/08/advocats-bicyclingons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>sU.car·bOn.di·oX·ide.FoOt·PRint:pArT-oNE</title>
		<link>http://www.cogjoint.com/index.php/2011/04/your_carbon_footprin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cogjoint.com/index.php/2011/04/your_carbon_footprin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MexicanSongBird</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blahblahfreddie.com/?p=1350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(ˈyȯr/ˈkärbən/di&#8217;äksid/ˈfu̇t-print/) This is your carbon footprint. If everyone suddenly stopped driving we&#8217;d reduce our carbon dioxide emissions by 10% (there&#8217;s a balance that also gets shifted around but we&#8217;ll ignore that for this argument). Consider that CO2 contribution next time you get in your car. Huh? 10%  &#8211; How many drivers need to be converted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a href="http://www.cogjoint.com/wp_sys/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/carbon_footprint.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1351" title="carbon_footprint" src="http://www.cogjoint.com/wp_sys/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/carbon_footprint.jpg" alt="" width="475" height="235" /></a>(ˈyȯr/ˈkärbən/di&#8217;äksid/ˈfu̇t-print/)</h2>
<p>This is your carbon footprint.</p>
<p>If everyone suddenly stopped driving we&#8217;d reduce our carbon dioxide emissions by 10% (there&#8217;s a balance that also gets shifted around but we&#8217;ll ignore that for this argument).</p>
<p>Consider that CO2 contribution next time you get in your car.</p>
<p>Huh? 10%  &#8211; How many drivers need to be converted to bicycling if we want to reduce our carbon output by just 1%?</p>
<p>I wonder how much it would offset (positive or negative) <span style="color: #888888;"><em><strong>car manufacture &amp; delivery</strong></em></span> or <span style="color: #888888;"><strong>c<em>lothes and personal effects</em></strong></span>.  How about <span style="color: #888888;"><em><strong>Recreation &amp; Leisure</strong></em></span>.</p>
<p>Looks like bicycle advocacy needs a stronger argument than merely CO2 reduction.  As BlahBlahFreddie likes to say: <span style="color: #888888;"><em><strong>&#8220;It&#8217;s about the safety stupid.&#8221;</strong></em></span></p>
<p>Image: <a href="http://www.carbonfootprint.com/carbonfootprint.html" target="_blank">http://www.carbonfootprint.com/carbonfootprint.html</a></p>
<div id="fb-root"></div>
   <script>
   window.fbAsyncInit = function() {
   FB.init({appId: "364015433630063", status: true, cookie: true,
		 xfbml: true});
	};
 (function() {
  var e = document.createElement("script"); e.async = true;
 e.src = document.location.protocol +
   "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js";
 document.getElementById("fb-root").appendChild(e);
}());
</script><span class = ""  style = "  float: left; "><fb:like href="http://www.cogjoint.com/index.php/2011/04/your_carbon_footprin/" send = "true" layout="standard" show_faces="true" width="" action="like" colorscheme="light" font="arial" /></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cogjoint.com/index.php/2011/04/your_carbon_footprin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
